Sunday, October 22, 2017

Sermon 15 -- 2 Timothy: Introduction

Sermon 15 -- 2 Timothy: Introduction


My last two sermon series, the book of Hebrews and the Gospel of Philip, were deeply indebted to the Apostle Paul; Hebrews, was almost certainly NOT written by Paul, but was based on his teachings, and the Gospel of Philip was written around the same time as the letters of Paul, (maybe a little later), and develops Gnostic concepts that were widely circulated among the early Christians if not that often written down (or at least preserved). Thus am I drawn irresistibly toward the writings of Paul himself. The suggestion to explore 2nd Timothy came to me in meditation, and I did not know why--but the minute I started working on it, I discovered an important reason I would have been led to this book: 2nd Timothy is understood to be Paul’s last letter, and is considered by some to be his last will and testament. Thus, as I approach death, I am instructed to learn from Paul the things that he thought were ultimately the most important. 

It is not possible to attribute precise dates to events that are known to have happened in the ancient world, but the year Paul was executed in Rome, (decapitated by Nero), is thought to have been in the summer of 64 CE, and 2nd Timothy seems to have been written shortly before that. Dates as late as 68 CE have also been suggested. Be that as it may, whenever it was written, 2nd Timothy stands out as a blazingly brilliant summary of the teachings of Paul, and I welcome it into to my fund of spiritual testaments.

As you may remember, I began my ministry at the Basin Bible Church by reviewing in detail all four synoptic gospels. The natural thing would have been to continue on, chronologically, into the New Testament with Acts and Romans, etc.; but, since the early days of my career as a professing Christian, I have always had a problem with Paul—I have never liked his dogmatic formulations, and I have felt, often enough, that what he says directly contradicts some of the sayings of Jesus. I readily forgave him his loyalty to the LAW, because I always knew that, as a Jew, Paul had to incorporate elements of his contemporary social morality into his doctrine; but I have found that Paul’s down-to-earth missionary strategy was not always perfectly harmonious with Jesus’ more radical approach to social behavior. 

Recently, my attitude has mellowed somewhat; nowadays I am more tolerant of this aspect of Paul’s belief system. I have had to remember that his job was to consolidate the churches of the ancient world under one over-arching doctrine that could bind groups of disparate temperaments together, directed toward a single purpose—changing the world. I acknowledge that this was a daunting job, and that, especially with a bunch of Jews who were used to following a plethora of strict laws and restrictions, the freedom preached by Jesus might have been too much for some literal-minded people to handle; too much freedom gives the insecure mind room to wander and lose focus; Paul insists on strict adherence to his version of the truth. Additionally, I have become aware of the mystical side of Paul, which, before my survey of the Gnostic Gospels, was pretty invisible to me.
So, here we go. This sermon series will begin with a Wikipedia summary of the life of Paul, and his missionary travels, with some extra commentary on the intellectual climate of his time. Next week we will delve into the first chapter of the book:

“Paul the Apostle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Paul the Apostle (Latin: Paulus; Greek: Παλος, translit. Paulos; c. 5 – c. 67), commonly known as Saint Paul and also known by his native name Saul of Tarsus (Hebrew: שאול התרסי‎, translit. Sha'ul ha-Tarsi‎; Greek: Σαλος Ταρσεύς, translit. Saulos Tarseus), was an apostle (though not one of the Twelve Apostles) who taught the gospel of the Christ to the first century world.

Paul is generally considered one of the most important figures of the Apostolic Age and in the mid-30s to the mid-50s AD he founded several churches in Asia Minor and Europe. He took advantage of his status as both a Jew and a Roman citizen to minister to both Jewish and Roman audiences. According to writings in the New Testament and prior to his conversion, Paul was dedicated to persecuting the early disciples of Jesus in the area of Jerusalem. (He was present at the martyrdom of St. Stephen). In the narrative of the Acts of the Apostles (often referred to simply as Acts), Paul was traveling on the road from Jerusalem to Damascus on a mission to "arrest them and bring them back to Jerusalem" when the resurrected Jesus appeared to him in a great light. He was struck blind, but after three days his sight was restored by Ananias of Damascus and Paul began to preach that Jesus of Nazareth is the Jewish Messiah and the Son of God.

Fourteen of the twenty-seven books in the New Testament have traditionally been attributed to Paul. Seven of the epistles are undisputed by scholars as being authentic, with varying degrees of argument about the remainder. Pauline authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews is not asserted in the Epistle itself and was already doubted in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. It was almost unquestioningly accepted from the 5th to the 16th centuries that Paul was the author of Hebrews  but that view is now almost universally rejected by scholars. The other six are believed by some scholars to have come from followers writing in his name, using material from Paul's surviving letters and letters written by him that no longer survive. 

Paul's influence on Christian thought and practice has been characterized as being as "profound as it is pervasive", among that of many other apostles and missionaries involved in the spread of the Christian faith. Augustine of Hippo developed Paul's idea that salvation is based on faith and not "works of the law". Martin Luther's interpretation of Paul's writings influenced Luther's doctrine of sola fide.”
[Sidebar:
Sola fide, also historically known as the doctrine of justification by faith alone, is a Christian theological doctrine that distinguishes most Protestant denominations from Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity, and some in the Restoration Movement.”
Back to Wikipedia:]
“It has been popularly assumed that Saul's name was changed when he converted from Judaism to Christianity, but that is not the case. His Jewish name was "Saul" (Hebrew: שָׁאוּל, Modern Sha'ul, Tiberian Šāʼûl; "asked for, prayed for, borrowed"), perhaps after the biblical King Saul, a fellow Benjamite and the first king of Israel. According to the Book of Acts, he inherited Roman citizenship from his father. As a Roman citizen, he also bore the Latin name of "Paul"—in biblical Greek: Παλος (Paulos), and in Latin: Paulus. It was quite usual for the Jews of that time to have two names, one Hebrew, the other Latin or Greek.

Jesus called him "Saul, Saul" in "the Hebrew tongue" in the book of Acts, when he had the vision which led to his conversion on the Road to Damascus. Later, in a vision to Ananias of Damascus, "the Lord" referred to him as "Saul, of Tarsus". When Ananias came to restore his sight, he called him "Brother Saul".

In Acts 13:9, Saul is called "Paul" for the first time on the island of Cyprus—much later than the time of his conversion. The author (Luke) indicates that the names were interchangeable: "Saul, who also is called Paul." He thereafter refers to him as Paul, apparently Paul's preference since he is called Paul in all other Bible books where he is mentioned, including those that he authored. Adopting his Roman name was typical of Paul's missionary style. His method was to put people at their ease and to approach them with his message in a language and style to which they could relate, as in 1 Cor 9:19–23.

1 Corinthians 9:19-23 
19Though I am free and belong to no one, I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law), so as to win those not having the law. 22To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some. 23I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.”

Geography relevant to Paul's life, stretching from Jerusalem to Rome:

Paul was likely born between the years of 5 BC and 5 AD. The Book of Acts indicates that Paul was a Roman citizen by birth, more affirmatively describing his father as such, but some scholars have taken issue with the evidence presented by the text.

He was from a devout Jewish family in the city of Tarsus–one of the largest trade centers on the Mediterranean coast. It had been in existence several hundred years prior to his birth. It was renowned for its university. During the time of Alexander the Great, who died in 323 BC, Tarsus was the most influential city in Asia Minor

Paul referred to himself as being "of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee". The family had a history of religious piety. Apparently the family lineage had been very attached to Pharisaic traditions and observances for generations. Acts says that he was in the tent-making profession. This was to become an initial connection with Priscilla and Aquila with whom he would partner in tent-making and later become very important teammates as fellow missionaries. 

While he was still fairly young, he was sent to Jerusalem to receive his education at the school of Gamaliel, one of the most noted rabbis in history. The Hillel school was noted for giving its students a balanced education, likely giving Paul broad exposure to classical literature, philosophy, and ethics.” 

[Sidebar: At the moment I am reading the Taylor Caldwell fictional biography of Luke (Dear and Glorious Physician), and have noticed that Gamaliel is mentioned as one of Luke’s teachers in Alexandria. This connection is important enough, but the comment that Paul was exposed to the classical literature and philosophy of the Greeks, is even more important. As we will see below, the philosophy of Plato appears in more than one place in Paul’s theology.

Back to Wikipedia:]

“Nothing more is known of his background until he takes an active part in the martyrdom of Stephen. Paul confesses that "beyond measure" he persecuted the church of God prior to his conversion. Although we know from his biography and from Acts that Paul could speak Hebrew, modern scholarship suggests that Koine Greek was his first language.

In his letters, Paul drew heavily on his knowledge of Stoic philosophy, using Stoic terms and metaphors to assist his new Gentile converts in their understanding of the revealed word of God. He also owed much to his training in the law and the prophets, utilizing this knowledge to convince his Jewish countrymen of the unity of past Old Testament prophecy and covenants with the fulfilling of these in Jesus Christ. His wide spectrum of experiences and education gave the "Apostle to the Gentiles" the tools which he later would use to effectively spread the Gospel and to establish the church in the Roman Empire.”

[Sidebar--Wikipedia on stoicism: 
Stoicism is a school of Hellenistic philosophy that flourished throughout the Roman and Greek world until the 3rd century AD. Stoicism is predominantly a philosophy of personal ethics which is informed by its system of logic and its views on the natural world. According to its teachings, as social beings, the path to happiness for humans is found in accepting this moment as it presents itself, by not allowing ourselves to be controlled by our desire for pleasure or our fear of pain, by using our minds to understand the world around us and to do our part in nature's plan, and by working together and treating others in a fair and just manner.

It was founded in Athens by Zeno of Citium in the early 3rd century BC. The Stoics taught that emotions resulted in errors of judgment which were destructive, due to the active relationship between cosmic determinism and human freedom, and the belief that it is virtuous to maintain a will (called prohairesis) that is in accord with nature. Because of this, the Stoics presented their philosophy as a way of life (lex divina), and they thought that the best indication of an individual's philosophy was not what a person said but how a person behaved. To live a good life, one had to understand the rules of the natural order since they taught that everything was rooted in nature.”]

[Sidebar:
The idea that “the best indication of an individual's philosophy was not what a person said but how a person behaved.” is in contradistinction with the idea that “salvation is based on faith and not "works of the law". Thus, we can see that, when Paul converted to Jesus’ new preference of Faith over Works, he had to abandon not only the Jewish fierce fidelity to the LAW, but also the Greek rationalism he had learned at the Hillel University. Moreover, from this it may be seen that the Wave/Particle dichotomy that continues to complicate spiritual knowledge today with its logical contradictions, was in full force even 2000 years ago, when Paul was seeking to carve a new religion out of the ancient traditions.

Back to Stoicism:]
“Later Stoics—such as Seneca and Epictetus—emphasized that, because "virtue is sufficient for happiness", a sage was immune to misfortune. This belief is similar to the meaning of the phrase "stoic calm", though the phrase does not include the "radical ethical" Stoic views that only a sage can be considered truly free, and that all moral corruptions are equally vicious.”

[Sidebar: Note the expression, "stoic calm"; I cannot help recalling the material we reviewed in The Gospel of Philip about the “CALM” of the Bridal Chamber. The appearance of the concept of “stoic calm”, (which equates with the Eastern concepts of “equanimity”, “bliss”, and “nirvana”), just goes to show that the essence of Christianity is linked to even more ancient, so-called “pagan” concepts of spiritual reality. Maybe God wasn’t born yesterday.

The following summary of Paul’s self-estimation and doctrine is of interest, especially the comments down the page on Paul’s before-and-after beliefs:
“Paul described himself as 
    • o a servant of Jesus Christ;
    • o having experienced an unforeseen, sudden, startling change, due to all-powerful grace—not the fruit of his reasoning or thoughts; 
    • o having seen Christ as did the other apostles when Christ appeared to him as he appeared to Peter, to James, to the Twelve, after his Resurrection; 
    • o called to be an apostle;
    • o set apart for the gospel of God.

Paul described Jesus as having been promised by God beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures;
    • o being the true messiah and the Son of God;
    • o having biological lineage from David ("according to the flesh");
    • o having been declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead;
    • o being Jesus Christ our Lord;
    • o the One through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations, "including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ".
    • Jesus 
      • lives in heaven;
      • is God's Son;
      • would soon return.
[Here are the before-and-after remarks:]
    • The Cross 
    • he now believed Jesus' death was a voluntary sacrifice that reconciled sinners with God. 
    • The Law 
    • he now believed the law only reveals the extent of people's enslavement to the power of sin—a power that must be broken by Christ. 
    • Gentiles 
    • he had believed Gentiles were outside the covenant that God made with Israel;
    • he now believed Gentiles and Jews were united as the people of God in Christ Jesus. 
    • Circumcision 
    • had believed circumcision was the rite through which males became part of Israel, an exclusive community of God's chosen people; 
    • he now believed that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but that the new creation is what counts in the sight of God, and that this new creation is a work of Christ in the life of believers, making them part of the church, an inclusive community of Jews and Gentiles reconciled with God through faith. 
    • Persecution 
    • had believed his violent persecution of the church to be an indication of his zeal for his religion; 
    • he now believed Jewish hostility toward the church was sinful opposition that would incur God's wrath;
    • he believed he was halted by Christ when his fury was at its height; It was "through zeal" that he persecuted the Church, and he obtained mercy because he had "acted ignorantly in unbelief".


    • The Last Days 
    • had believed God's messiah would put an end to the old age of evil and initiate a new age of righteousness;
    • he now believed this would happen in stages that had begun with the resurrection of Jesus, but the old age would continue until Jesus returns.

Paul is critical both theologically and empirically of claims of moral or lineal superiority of Jews while conversely strongly sustaining the notion of a special place for the Children of Israel.

After his conversion, Paul went to Damascus, where Acts 9 states he was healed of his blindness and baptized by Ananias of Damascus. Paul says that it was in Damascus that he barely escaped death. Paul also says that he then went first to Arabia, and then came back to Damascus. Paul's trip to Arabia is not mentioned anywhere else in the Bible, and some suppose he actually traveled to Mount Sinai for meditations in the desert. 

Paul asserted that he received the Gospel not from man, but directly by "the revelation of Jesus Christ". He claimed almost total independence from the Jerusalem community, but agreed with it on the nature and content of the gospel. He appeared eager to bring material support to Jerusalem from the various growing Gentile churches that he started. In his writings, Paul used the persecutions he endured to avow proximity and union with Jesus and as a validation of his teaching.”
What follows is a place-to-place travelogue of Paul’s three missionary journeys:
“First missionary journey
The author of Acts arranges Paul's travels into three separate journeys. The first journey, led initially by Barnabas, took Paul from Antioch to Cyprus then into southern Asia Minor (Anatolia), and finally returning to Antioch. In Cyprus, Paul rebukes and blinds Elymas the magician who was criticizing their teachings. From this point on, Paul is described as the leader of the group.

Interval at Antioch
Antioch served as a major Christian center for Paul's evangelism, and he remained there for "a long time with the disciples" at the conclusion of his first journey. The exact duration of Paul's stay in Antioch is unknown, with estimates ranging from nine months to as long as eight years.

Incident at Antioch
Despite the agreement achieved at the Council of Jerusalem concerning circumcision, Paul recounts how he later publicly confronted Peter in a dispute sometimes called the "Incident at Antioch", over Peter's reluctance to share a meal with Gentile Christians in Antioch because they did not strictly adhere to Jewish customs. 

Writing later of the incident, Paul recounts, "I opposed [Peter] to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong", and says he told Peter, "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?" 

Second missionary journey
Paul left for his second missionary journey from Jerusalem, in late Autumn 49, after the meeting of the Council of Jerusalem where the circumcision question was debated. On their trip around the Mediterranean sea, Paul and his companion Barnabas stopped in Antioch where they had a sharp argument about taking John Mark with them on their trips. The book of Acts said that John Mark had left them in a previous trip and gone home. Unable to resolve the dispute, Paul and Barnabas decided to separate; Barnabas took John Mark with him, while Silas joined Paul.

Paul and Silas initially visited Tarsus (Paul's birthplace), Derbe and Lystra. In Lystra, they met Timothy, a disciple who was spoken well of, and decided to take him with them. The Church kept growing, adding believers, and strengthening in faith daily.

In Philippi, Paul cast a spirit of divination out of a servant girl, whose masters were then unhappy about the loss of income her soothsaying provided (Acts 16:16–24). They turned the city against the missionaries, and Paul and Silas were put in jail. After a miraculous earthquake, the gates of the prison fell apart and Paul and Silas could have escaped but remained; this event led to the conversion of the jailor (Acts 16:25–40). They continued traveling, going by Berea and then to Athens, where Paul preached to the Jews and God-fearing Greeks in the synagogue and to the Greek intellectuals in the Areopagus. Paul continued from Athens to Corinth.

Third missionary journey
According to Acts, Paul began his third missionary journey by travelling all around the region of Galatia and Phrygia to strengthen, teach and rebuke the believers. Paul then traveled to Ephesus, an important center of early Christianity, and stayed there for almost three years, probably working there as a tentmaker, as he had done when he stayed in Corinth. He is claimed to have performed numerous miracles, healing people and casting out demons, and he apparently organized missionary activity in other regions. Paul left Ephesus after an attack from a local silversmith resulted in a pro-Artemis riot involving most of the city. During his stay in Ephesus, Paul wrote four letters to the church in Corinth. 

Paul went through Macedonia into Achaea (Acts 20:1–2) and stayed in Greece, probably Corinth, for three months during 56–57 AD. Commentators generally agree that Paul dictated his Epistle to the Romans during this period. He then made ready to continue on to Syria, but he changed his plans and traveled back through Macedonia because of some Jews who had made a plot against him. In Romans 15:19 Paul wrote that he visited Illyricum, but he may have meant what would now be called Illyria Graeca, which was at that time a division of the Roman province of Macedonia. On their way back to Jerusalem, Paul and his companions visited other cities such as Philippi, Troas, Miletus, Rhodes, and Tyre. Paul finished his trip with a stop in Caesarea, where he and his companions stayed with Philip the Evangelist before finally arriving at Jerusalem. 
Journey from Rome to Spain
Among the writings of the early Christians, Pope Clement I said that Paul was "Herald (of the Gospel of Christ) in the West", and that "he had gone to the extremity of the west". John Chrysostom indicated that Paul preached in Spain: "For after he had been in Rome, he returned to Spain, but whether he came thence again into these parts, we know not". Cyril of Jerusalem said that Paul, "fully preached the Gospel, and instructed even imperial Rome, and carried the earnestness of his preaching as far as Spain, undergoing conflicts innumerable, and performing Signs and wonders". 

Visits to Jerusalem in Acts and the epistles
In 57, upon completion of his third missionary journey, Paul arrived in Jerusalem for his fifth and final visit with a collection of money for the local community. Acts reports that he initially was warmly received. However, Acts goes on to recount how Paul was warned by James and the elders that he was gaining a reputation for being against the Law, saying "they have been told about you that you teach all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or walk according to our customs". Paul underwent a purification ritual in order to give the Jews no grounds to bring accusations against him for not following their law.

After seven days in Jerusalem, some "Jews from Asia" (most likely from Roman Asia) accused Paul of defiling the temple by bringing gentiles into it. He was seized and dragged out of the temple by an angry mob. He narrowly escaped being killed by surrendering to a group of Roman centurions, who arrested him, put him in chains and took him to the tribune. 

When a plot to kill Paul on his way to an appearance before the Jews was discovered, he was transported by night to Caesarea Maritima. He was held as a prisoner there for two years, until a new governor reopened his case in 59. When the governor suggested that he be sent back to Jerusalem for further trial, Paul exercised his right as a Roman citizen to "appeal unto Caesar". Finally, Paul and his companions sailed for Rome where Paul was to stand trial for his alleged crimes. 

Acts recounts that on the way to Rome for his appeal as a Roman citizen to Caesar, Paul was shipwrecked on "Melita" (Malta), where the islanders showed him "unusual kindness" and where he was met by Publius. From Malta, he travelled to Rome via Syracuse, Rhegium and Puteoli

Two years in Rome
He finally arrived in Rome around 60, where he spent another two years under house arrest. The narrative of Acts ends with Paul preaching in Rome for two years from his rented home while awaiting trial.

The New Testament does not say when or how Paul died. The date of Paul's death is believed to have occurred after the Great Fire of Rome in July 64, but before the last year of Nero's reign, in 68.

A legend later developed that his martyrdom occurred at the Acquae Salviae, on the Via Laurentina. According to this legend, after Paul was decapitated, his severed head rebounded three times, giving rise to a source of water each time that it touched the ground, which is how the place earned the name "San Paolo alle Tre Fontane" ("St Paul at the Three Fountains"). 

Paul's letters reveal a remarkable human being: dedicated, compassionate, emotional, sometimes harsh and angry, clever and quick-witted, supple in argumentation, and above all possessing a soaring, passionate commitment to God, Jesus Christ, and his own mission. Fortunately, after his death one of his followers collected some of the letters, edited them very slightly, and published them. They constitute one of history's most remarkable personal contributions to religious thought and practice. 

Basic message
Paul's writings emphasized the crucifixion, Christ's resurrection and the Parousia or second coming of Christ.  E. P. Sanders finds three major emphases in Paul's writings: 
    • His strongest emphasis was on the death, resurrection, and lordship of Jesus Christ. He preached that one's faith in Jesus assures that person a share in Jesus' life (salvation). He saw Jesus' death as being for the believers' benefit, not a defeat. Jesus died so that believers' sins would be forgiven.
    • The resurrection of Jesus was of primary importance to Paul, as may be seen in his first letter to the Thessalonians which is the earliest surviving account of conversion to Christianity. 
    • The resurrection brought the promise of salvation to believers. Paul taught that, when Christ returned, those who had died believing in Christ as the saviour of mankind would be brought back to life, while those still alive would be "caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air".

Paul's theology of the gospel accelerated the separation of the messianic sect of Christians from Judaism, a development contrary to Paul's own intent. He wrote that faith in Christ was alone decisive in salvation for Jews and Gentiles alike, making the schism between the followers of Christ and mainstream Jews inevitable and permanent. He argued that Gentile converts did not need to become Jews, get circumcised, follow Jewish dietary restrictions, or otherwise observe Mosaic laws to be saved. Nevertheless, in Romans he insisted on the positive value of the Law, as a moral guide.

According to Bart Ehrman, Paul believed that Jesus would return within his lifetime. He states that Paul expected that Christians who had died in the mean time would be resurrected to share in God's kingdom, and he believed that the saved would be transformed, assuming supernatural bodies.

Paul's influence on Christian thinking arguably has been more significant than any other New Testament author. Paul declared that "Christ is the end of the law", exalted the Christian church as the body of Christ, and depicted the world outside the Church as under judgment. Paul's writings include the earliest reference to the "Lord's Supper", a rite traditionally identified as the Christian communion or Eucharist. The themes of predestination found in Western Christianity do not appear in Eastern theology. Augustine's foundational work on the gospel as a gift (grace), on morality as life in the Spirit, on predestination, and on original sin all derives from Paul, especially Romans.

Elaine Pagels, professor of religion at Princeton University and an authority on Gnosticism, declined to judge (in her book The Gnostic Paul) whether Paul was actually a Gnostic. Instead, she concentrated on how the Gnostics interpreted Paul's letters and how evidence from gnostic sources may challenge the assumption that Paul wrote his letters to combat "gnostic opponents" and to repudiate their statement that they possess secret wisdom.

Among the critics of Paul the Apostle was Thomas Jefferson, a Deist, who wrote that Paul was the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus." Christian anarchists, such as Leo Tolstoy and Ammon Hennacy, take a similar view. F.F. Powell argues that Paul, in his epistles, made use of many of the ideas of the Greek philosopher Plato, sometimes even using the same metaphors and language. For example, in Phaedrus, Plato has Socrates saying that the heavenly ideals are perceived as though "through a glass dimly", Paul's language closely mirrors this phrase 1 Corinthians 13.”

Thus endeth this review of Paul’s life and travels. I have found it helpful to get a firm grasp of the big picture of this great man, by following his travels on a map, so I can get a tangible feel for where he went and what he accomplished. Next time we will see what his last will and testament has to say.


Let us pray: Jesus thank you for the kind of inspiration You can give us to change our ways and light us with a passion for Your Word. Thank you for giving us a man like Paul to push us along the spiritual path by word and example. Amen.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

Sermon 14—Philip 12

Sermon 14—Philip 12


Today’s sermon concludes our survey of The Gospel of Philip. Although we have been unable to detect any over-arching structure to this so-called “gospel” which has proven to be more of a catechesis—an instruction manual for new Christian converts, this last section definitely has the flavor of a reprise. The first verses we will review, 124-125 summarize all the points previously made about levels of consciousness: last will be first, first last; the secrecy of the bridal chamber; the role of images in the structure of divine knowledge; and the rending of the veil between God and Man. This is the Isenburg translation.

“124 At the present time, we have the manifest things of creation. We say, "The strong who are held in high regard are great people. And the weak who are despised are the obscure." 

Contrast the manifest things of truth: they are weak and despised, while the hidden things are strong and held in high regard. 
The mysteries of truth are revealed, though in type and image.

125. The Bridal Chamber is hidden. It is the innermost.
At first, the veil concealed how God controls the Creation.
But when it is rent (for spiritual warriors who come close to it), and the One Who is inside reveals Himself, then one leaves this house of separation (the body). Moreover, it will be destroyed (dematerialized).”

At this point Philip takes us through the steps involved in entering the Bridal Chamber:

“… But the Divine of a spiritual warrior does not enter the Holy of the Holiest at once, because It cannot unite (at once) with the Light, with Which It has not been united yet, and with the Primordial Consciousness, the gate to
Which has not been opened yet (for entering). The Primordial Consciousness will be under the wings of the Cross and under Its Arms. This meditation will be the saving ark for the spiritual warrior even if the flood comes.
There are some of the companions of Christ who then will be able to enter inside behind the veil together with the High Priest (Christ).”

The next paragraph is of interest because it affirms the DEMOCRATIC aspect of Christianity—that is the idea that the Abode of the Father is accessible to everyone, not only those of social rank and position. This is one of the many radical ideas that Jesus brought into the world. We have to remember that human society has always been divided into graduated strata of privilege and favor; slave and free, aristocrat and commoner, rich and poor. Jesus came to declare that ALL souls are created equal under the dominion of God the Father, and one’s position in the social hierarchy was not an impediment to spiritual salvation. This is an IMPORTANT aspect of the kingdom on Earth that Jesus made possible—Jesus did not change the outer structure of human society, He changed the inner attitude that society had imprinted on people from birth—thus, as we have seen many times before, Jesus favors the mode of transformation that begins with the inner Man and proceeds outward into his deeds. In previous sermons we have suggested that spiritual transformation can go both ways—from outer to inner as well as inner to outer; and on some levels of consciousness, the outer to inner works pretty well. But on Jesus’ level the inner to the outer is always preferred.

“The veil (of Jerusalem temple) was not rent at the top only. If it were so, then the entrance would have been opened only for those who are of high rank (on the Earth).
And it was not rent at the bottom only, because then it would have pointed only to the lower ones (of social hierarchy).

But it was rent from the top to the bottom. The entrance is opened also for us who are low, so that we may enter the Treasury of the Truth. In it, there is the One Who is by right held in high regard, Who is Imperishable.

Yet, we make the Way to that place through disdained symbols and ephemeral images. They are disdained by those who hold the earthly glory. Yet, there is Glory above glory, and there is Power above power.
The Perfection opened for us the Treasury of the
Truth. The Holy of Holiest was opened for us, and the
Bridal Chamber invited us in!”

I love the expression “Treasury of the Truth”. Truth is indeed the most precious treasure we can acquire in this dimension. Remember that Jesus said:

Matthew 6:4-6, 18-21:
That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.
And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

 18That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.
19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:
21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. 21For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”

Notice that this scripture divides consciousness into the same discrete levels that Philip does—the secret inner prayer manifesting in the physical. This truncated quotation uses the expression, “reward thee openly” THREE times. To Jesus the treasures of the heart resonate not only in higher dimensions but lower as well, once more affirming what we have just said about Jesus’ preference for the inner to outer declension. It also reaffirms His commitment to inspiring the people to become aware of the Heaven on Earth that is available to those with the right attitude!

Going on:

“… As long as all this is hidden from people, evil leads them to the futile. And they have not separated it from that which was sown by the Holy Spirit. Such people are slaves of evil.

But when This approached, the Perfect Light embraces every one (of those who enter It). And those who are in
It receive the blessing. Thus slaves become free, and those who were captured become liberated!

126. Every plant that was not planted by My Heavenly
Father will be torn out. Let they who are separate — unite (in the highest eons) having become Perfect! All Who enter the Bridal Chamber will kindle the Light of Truth more, for They are not begotten in the darkness as those begotten in earthly marriages! The Fire will burn in the night and flare up stronger, because the mysteries of this Marriage are performed in the Light of Day! That Light of Day will never cease (for Them)!

127. If one becomes a Son of the Bridal Chamber, it means that this One has cognized the Light (of the Holy Spirit) before. The one who has not cognized It in the world of matter will not receive It in That place.”

Here is another reference to the role that the physical dimension plays in the overall drama of spiritual progress. “The one who has not cognized It in the world of matter will not receive It in That place.” In other words, you have to receive enlightened knowledge IN THE PHYSICAL in order for it to translate to the spiritual. Antonov has repeatedly declared that spiritual progress can only be made while the soul is wedded to a physical body. Here, contrary to the strategy Jesus has preferred of working from the inner Man outward, we see the suggestion that the physical is necessary to effect change on the soul. In previous sermons we have noted the following paragraphs: from an early comment of Antonov we read:
“The meaning of that which we call organic life on the planet Earth consists in the development of consciousness incarnated in its containers — the living bodies. Having begun their evolution as primitive energetic microformations on the lattice of minerals, having passed then through many incarnations in vegetal, animal, and human bodies, some souls finally become Godlike and flow into the Creator — the Primordial Universal Consciousness, thus being consumed by Him. This constitutes His Evolution. We are its participants. It is thanks to this that the process of qualitative and quantitative growth of the consciousness can take place. The development of man can take place only in the incarnate state.

The point is that the body is a “factory” for transformation of energy. In the body, the energy extracted, first of all, from ordinary food can become the energy of the consciousness, of the soul. It is thanks to this that the process of qualitative and quantitative growth of the consciousness can take place. 

Moreover, spiritually developed people, at the final stages of the personal evolution, sacrifice themselves, their individualities— for the sake of Merging in Love with the Primordial Consciousness. For such people it is natural, because they are in the state of highest love for the Highest Beloved! From the outside, it may seem as sacrificial self-annihilation.”

My comment on Antonov’s comment ran thus:

“He doesn’t say why or how this energy transformation takes place, and he doesn’t say how the physical food is transformed into spiritual food--and this is a problem for those of us who would like a straight rational answer to doctrinal questions. Nevertheless, if we go deeper into his logic, we might eventually stumble onto an essentially truthful answer, if only an answer that raises new questions. 


Recently, in meditation, I was given a metaphor that helped me get closer to an understanding of why “the development of man can take place only in the incarnate state.” I have always thought of carnal life and the afterlife as separate things—first one then the other; but if we think of the carnal life as an appendage of the spiritual life, a permanent imprint on the face of the Cosmic host, then a transcendental relationship between death and life may be perceived. As such, we can see that the experiences in the body do not simply disappear when we pass on to the higher planes, but they continue to resonate in the Mind and Memory of God. 

It was explained to me the activities of Earthly life are kind of like the slow repetitious process of practicing on a musical instrument—a mechanical process which is tedious and essentially meaningless for its own sake, but which is necessary to prepare us for the performance onstage. Without the physicalization of technical practice, spirit would have no channel to express itself through the physical; that is to say, without this physicalization, the body would have no channel through which it could access the ecstasy of musical expression which is purely spiritual. Hence, Terrestrial Life=Practice, Heavenly Life=Performance. These are comfortable thoughts, which work to validate Earthly existence, and which affirm the spiritual resonance of everything we DO on this plane.”

Hence, this idea of resonance in the Mind and Memory of God, necessarily references the outside-time quality of predestination. Obviously the Mind and Memory of God are timeless, and yet there is a sequential parameter to both mind and memory that implies a multi-layered structure, i.e. an outside-Time and an inside-Time quality, some kind of physical/non-physical dimension that flows back and forth between Time and Eternity. Predestination must exist, in essence, outside time, and, in expression, inside Time. Moreover, the notion that, “all what you mentioned is this Flesh. And one must rise in this very Flesh, since everything is in It,” refers to the idea that “Pleroma”, the Fullness of God, includes the Flesh.

Going on with the Antonov translation of Philip, we repeat the verse that says, “The one who has not cognized It in the world of matter will not receive It in That place.”

“127. If one becomes a Son of the Bridal Chamber, it means that this One has cognized the Light (of the Holy Spirit) before. The one who has not cognized It in the world of matter will not receive It in That place.”

And here is the ecstatic grand finale: 

“The One Who has cognized the Light (of the Holy Spirit) cannot be seen and captured (by evil spirits). And (evil spirits) cannot torment such a Perfect One even if this One still abides in the world of matter (in a body). Such a Perfect One has cognized the Truth and dwells now in the Abode of the Primordial Consciousness! And It is opened for such a Perfect One — in the Light of the Holy Day!”

Summarizing the many wide-ranging episodes of Philip is a daunting prospect for me, so I have grabbed a number of summaries off the internet which should help remind us of the main points of this deep and many-layered book.

Wesley Center Online
The Gospel Of Philip
Summary: 
“Though called a gospel, The Gospel of Philip is a random anthology of mystical statements of many literary genres. Its main focus is the restoration of humanity's original androgynous nature as God created it. This book claims that death is the result of the division of the sexes. Jesus is the first one to overcome this division of the sexes and has made available to his followers the resurrection by which they too may attain an androgynous nature. The author refers to the "Bridal Chamber," which is the instrumental, yet mysterious, sacrament by which men and women enter into knowledge of their new sexless state. Four other sacraments are also identified - baptism (by immersion), Eucharist, chrism (anointing with oil for immortality), and ransom. The resurrection is understood as spiritual in nature, and so able to be experienced before physical death. The author speculates on the meanings of Jesus' names.”

This summary hits the nail on the head with its declaration that Philip is an “anthology of mystical statements”, that the "Bridal Chamber, is an instrumental, yet mysterious, sacrament”, and most importantly, that “the resurrection is understood as spiritual in nature, and so able to be experienced before physical death.” It is provided by The Wesley Center, which we had presumed to be a phalanx of the Methodist Church, but we discovered, surprisingly, it is also connected to the Northwest Nazarene University. This said, in order to buy into this encapsulation we must consider the word, “androgynous”, and the term “sexless”. Indeed, most of us casually define “androgynous” as “sexless”, but an alternate dictionary definition is:
“partly male and partly female in appearance; of indeterminate sex.
having the physical characteristics of both sexes; hermaphrodite.”

I would like to emphasize the definition of the word as, “partly male and partly female”. Clearly this is NOT the same thing as “sexless”, but rather more like “sexful”. I stress this because of the discussion we had some weeks ago about the role the element of gender plays in characterizing spiritual identity. The feminine principle of Creation is mentioned and developed numerous times in Philip, and we cannot ignore the two sermons we heard concerning the divinity of Mary Magdalene. Certainly we cannot forget Jesus’ statement in Matthew 22:30: 

30 “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.”

But I am not sure this means the same thing as “sexless”. The terminology “Bridal Chamber” carries with it a heavily sexual connotation, and the constant references to the bride and groom are certainly not without gender identity. We have also looked into the Gnostic concepts of the Father/Mother God, not a meaningless distinction. The beauty of Philip, (a quality of which am not aware, in any of the other gospels I know), is in its conception of the multi-dimensional structure of existence; nowhere in any of the other gospels are so many levels of consciousness described and integrated into such an homogeneous whole as in Philip. The effort Philip makes to awaken the devotee’s awareness of his place in the celestial hierarchy can only reinforce the idea that the lines of demarcation between levels are fuzzy if not invisible to the literal eye of the conscious mind. 

Moreover, it must be remembered that the Nicean Council of 325 was dedicated to aggressively expunging from the canonical texts the many mysteries of the preceding age that seemed to encourage superstitious beliefs among the people. Thus, much of the complexity of the religions of Jesus’ time was resolved by simply ignoring much of the more high-minded insights—insights which the church fathers thought might confuse and confound the common man. Consequently Jesus’ plea for a democratic religion accessible to everyone was vulgarized by the same impulses by which Hollywood has been motivated to cheapen the artistic output of our present era; for yea these many centuries, the word democratic has become equated with mediocre; I do not think this is what Jesus meant.

What follows is a lengthy excerpt from the introduction to The Gnostic Gospels by anthropologist Elaine Pagels, foremost expert on Dead Scrolls. This section explains some of the reasons the Gnostic Gospels were rejected by the Nicean Council, and focusses on some of the central perspectives declared in The Gospel of Philip. It begins with a comment on why certain texts were outlawed by the church fathers:

“But those who wrote and circulated these texts did not regard themselves as "heretics." Most of the writings use Christian terminology, unmistakably related to a Jewish heritage. Many claim to offer traditions about Jesus that are secret, hidden from "the many" who constitute what, in the second century, came to be called the "catholic church." These Christians are now called gnostics, from the Greek word gnosis, usually translated as "knowledge." For as those who claim to know nothing about ultimate reality are called agnostic (literally, "not-knowing"), the person who does claim to know such things is called gnostic ("knowing"). 

But gnosis is not primarily rational knowledge. The Greek language distinguishes between scientific or reflective knowledge ("He knows mathematics") and knowing through observation or experience ("He knows me"), which is gnosis. As the gnostics use the term, we could translate it as "insight," for gnosis involves an intuitive process of knowing oneself. And to know oneself, they claimed, is to know human nature and human destiny. According to the gnostic teacher Theodotus, writing in Asia Minor (c. 140-160), the gnostic is one who has come to understand who we were, and what we have become; where we were . . . whither we are hastening; from what we are being released; what birth is, and what is rebirth. Yet to know oneself, at the deepest level, is simultaneously to know God; this is the secret of gnosis. 
Another gnostic teacher, Monoimus, says: 

“Abandon the search for God and the creation and other matters of a similar sort. Look for him by taking yourself as the starting point. Learn who it is within you who makes everything his own and says, "My God, my mind, my thought, my soul, my body." 

Learn the sources of sorrow, joy, love, hate . . . If you carefully investigate these matters you will find him in yourself.” 

What Muhammad ‘Ali discovered at Nag Hammadi is, apparently, a library of writings, almost all of them gnostic. Although they claim to offer secret teaching, many of these texts refer to the Scriptures of the Old Testament, and others to the letters of Paul and the New Testament gospels. Many of them include the same dramatis personae as the New Testament—Jesus and his disciples. 

Yet the differences are striking. Orthodox Jews and Christians insist that a chasm separates humanity from its creator: God is wholly other. But some of the gnostics who wrote these gospels contradict this: self-knowledge is knowledge of God; the self and the divine are identical.”

Thus, the main message of Philip, “Let us seek Oneness with the Father in the Bridal Chamber, the Abode-of-the-Father”, is echoed in this general description of the Gnostic writings as a whole. 

The primary benefit I have enjoyed from the study of Philip has been the fluid entry into states of consciousness which were less vividly accessible to me before I read the book. I have learned to be less rigid in my thinking and more tolerant of thinking with which I disagree. I have been encouraged to contemplate the big picture of every episode of my life, and have been able to hear the repercussions of my acts as they reverberate down the corridors of time.

In conclusion I would like to reiterate the final verse of Phlip, serving as its own benediction. Let us pray:

“The One Who has cognized the Light (of the Holy Spirit) cannot be seen and captured (by evil spirits). And (evil spirits) cannot torment such a Perfect One even if this One still abides in the world of matter (in a body). Such a Perfect One has cognized the Truth and dwells now in the Abode of the Primordial Consciousness! And It is opened for such a Perfect One — in the Light of the Holy Day!”

Amen.”